TY - JOUR
T1 - Understanding and Remediating Backlash to DEI in Organizations
AU - Folberg, Abigail M.
AU - Corrington, Abigail
AU - Hebl, Mikki
AU - Nguyen, Linda T.
AU - Thomas, Heavenlei A.
AU - Kim, Hannah J.
PY - 2026/1/1
Y1 - 2026/1/1
N2 - This paper examines factors that have led to the dissolution of many diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives in public and private organizations across the United States and globally. Although anti-DEI backlash is not new, the current wave of anti-DEI backlash is unprecedented in many ways. In response, we present a conceptual model that suggests DEI may elicit negative affective (i.e., fear, animosity) and negative cognitive responses (i.e., perceived unfairness, biased construals), particularly among individuals who are members of dominant social groups (e.g., White people, men) and who endorse hierarchy-legitimizing ideologies (i.e., system justifying ideologies, social dominance orientation). These affective and cognitive reactions have led to a series of behaviors, which we categorize as subtle, active, and ambivalent resistance. We conclude by introducing propositions that may guide future research examining ways to effectively reduce anti-DEI backlash.
AB - This paper examines factors that have led to the dissolution of many diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives in public and private organizations across the United States and globally. Although anti-DEI backlash is not new, the current wave of anti-DEI backlash is unprecedented in many ways. In response, we present a conceptual model that suggests DEI may elicit negative affective (i.e., fear, animosity) and negative cognitive responses (i.e., perceived unfairness, biased construals), particularly among individuals who are members of dominant social groups (e.g., White people, men) and who endorse hierarchy-legitimizing ideologies (i.e., system justifying ideologies, social dominance orientation). These affective and cognitive reactions have led to a series of behaviors, which we categorize as subtle, active, and ambivalent resistance. We conclude by introducing propositions that may guide future research examining ways to effectively reduce anti-DEI backlash.
KW - Diversity
KW - backlash
KW - equity
KW - inclusion
KW - remediation
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=105040076770&origin=inward
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=105040076770&origin=inward
U2 - 10.1177/20413866261450981
DO - 10.1177/20413866261450981
M3 - Article
SN - 2041-3866
SP - 1
EP - 29
JO - Organizational Psychology Review
JF - Organizational Psychology Review
ER -